Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
70.89 CAD | +0.78% | +1.00% | +26.57% |
May. 24 | Risk of Sharp Copper Price Correction "Very High," Macquarie Says | MT |
May. 21 | Peru's 2024 copper target is realistic, mining magnates say | RE |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The group's high margin levels account for strong profits.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- The company benefits from high valuations in earnings multiples.
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Diversified Mining
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+26.57% | 26.97B | B- | ||
-11.70% | 150B | C+ | ||
-6.26% | 119B | C | ||
+1.83% | 74.34B | C+ | ||
+11.36% | 48.2B | B | ||
-4.84% | 45.45B | B+ | ||
+27.55% | 38.79B | C+ | ||
+116.04% | 34.78B | A- | ||
+74.05% | 20.02B | C+ | ||
+53.15% | 18.25B | - | C+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- TECK.B Stock
- Ratings Teck Resources Limited